Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Fraternities

What would a fraternity at St. Olaf look like? It is a fun thought, one I think could work with some effort. Would it be a brotherhood or no gender bound group of people who look after each other just because they are members? As our group looks into different fraternities like the Knight's Templar or Freemasonry, I can't help but create my own version of a unique and mysterious St. Olaf Fraternity.

The Royal Order of the Lion

Composed of a Counsel of 12 leaders and a limited amount of members. The group, like the freemasonry or the KKK, will eventually have long outstanding routes that could possibly effect America. An interesting prospect, and who knows? It could happen.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Coffee

You know, it is really hard to give up something that will actually affect the way you work with people.

What I gave up for Lent?

Caffeine.

I had a bad day on Monday. I did poorly on a test and I was disappointed on how socially I was interacting with some people. It is insane how much a cup of coffee changed my day. I felt alive, alert and able to face my problems head on. I loved it, and sadly I am happy I stopped giving up what I promised. Maybe it is the effort that counts. Maybe, as my religion professor Booth said, it is about learning about yourself and not being able to give something up. But I'm just happy to have my coffee back.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Lybia and the 21st Century Democracy Revolution

In a Time article I recently read, they put the revolution in the Middle East up against Europe in the 1800's. From rising food costs to similar authority power, the similarities were striking. I think it is fascinating how history could rhyme so easily and often. Democracy is necessary in countries whose people are oppressed and aren't allowed a word in how they are treated. I am very happy about this new-found Democracy, but I am wondering what the implications will be for the future. With a stronger Middle East, and most likely unified under democracy and similar historical back rounds, I could definitely see the Middle East aligning themselves together, forming a powerful bond such as the European Union or the SEAN. Where does this place America? We have no powerful, economic bond with any other group of nations. The global hegemony that the US maintains is also declining. What might happen? I would hope the United States will peer into themselves and see that the world that they are growing into just doesn't fit their political policy. For the good of the country, I hope we change.

My Absence and how that Should Change

Hello all who follow me and whoever may be reading this. I am going to apologize for my lack of blogging this semester and I just want to assure you all that this should change very soon. I am not exactly grasping the power of these blogs but I plan on writing much more for the rest of the semester. I plan on writing more about my opinions on life and Democracy and how they relate. I am very into the news, so often these posts will be reflected off of this. I apologize to all, and I hope this becomes a very interesting and wonderful read.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Part 3

By writing Democracy in America, De Tocqueville makes many observations that really tell what he has to say about America and proposes accurate advantages and disadvantages to the American system. He offers three occurrences that can be found in his observation of American Democracy. One is how America deals with the law, and how the Americans stop the tyranny of a majority rule. “Democratic laws generally tend toward the good of the greatest possible number for they stem from the majority of all the citizens, a majority which may be in error but which could not follow a path contrary to its own interests. Aristocratic laws tend, by contrast, toward concentrating wealth and power solely in the hands of a small number, because aristocracy consists of a minority by its very nature.” The majority rules in America. De Tocqueville has issues with this, where the system is not equal and many are unfairly left out and thrown aside. This tyranny is balanced however by realizing that in a mixed government the power of the sovereign has to go somewhere and that power it is decentralized through lack of an overreaching federal government. De Tocqueville also explains that judicially America can act in a utilitarian matter, where if there is a problem that a group is being oppressed they can act to help their needs. This tyranny cannot be without a description of De Tocqueville’s second distinction in Democracy of America where he states that America can be characterized by always valuing and having freedom but not necessarily having equality. This is opposed to the occurrence in France of oppressive equality, where even though there is complete equality between the people there is not freedom for the citizens of the country. The legitimacy of this claim can be argued, as there were slaves and the Native American population of America was extremely mistreated. But De Tocqueville does make mention of slavery in America, when he says “These evils are unquestionably great; but they are the necessary and foreseen consequence of the very principle of slavery.” American citizens were and always had a sense of freedom that is very important when recognizing how a republic and a democracy like the American system can come back.

De Tocqueville’s last major claim in Democracy in America is the importance of political and voluntary associations to the American political system. Associations, according to De Tocqueville, have a specific purpose that is vital for the wellbeing of America. “In the United States, associations aim to promote public safety, business, industry, morality, and religion. There is nothing the human will despairs of attaining through the free action of the combined power of individuals.” Associations come about from the freedoms that again characterize America, and they serve the people in ways that cannot be mimicked by the government. One association, the YMCA, or Young Men’s Christian Association really shows how much impact associations in America have and how much De Tocqueville was correct in his words above. In the 19th century, the YMCA was designed to allow immigrant youths to have a place to go and be active. With the sprawl in urbanization throughout this time, the YMCA flourished and found many members. This organization really shows how De Tocqueville’s belief in the importance of voluntary associations is true.

De Tocqueville’s Democracy in America offers to France and the rest of the world a unique look into a very distinct democracy, one that would be very difficult to replicate anywhere else. He makes many claims into how American democracy works, where he highly emphasizes the importance of citizen associations. These associations, he states, offer a specialized group led welfare to the whole country that is required for the country to exist and function as well as it has. America, De Tocqueville claims, is ruled by a majority, so there is always threat of tyrannical majority rule. He leaves us with evidence that shows the majority rule does not work like that but rather the American judicial and law system prevents this awful tyranny. De Tocqueville also discusses freedom in America and how lucky the Americans were to have always had freedom from the very start of their being. Democracy in America is an accurate representation of American democracy and De Tocqueville is correct in these observations of America in the 19th century.

Part two

The Origins of De Tocqueville’s claims come from his reasons for writing Democracy in America. Alexis De Tocqueville was born in France in the early 1800’s. A prominent politician in his later years, De Tocqueville wrote of American Democracy when he was young and still observing the world. With discontent for the French political system and distaste for the way the aristocracy ruled France, Alexis De Tocqueville traveled to America and observed how America goes about its democratic ways. He compares this to France and France’s system, where often in the book he discusses issues like freedom before equality and the tyranny of the majority or minority. Being French, De Tocqueville obviously wrote this work to show France another working model to replace or modify the French Aristocracy. Democracy in America also has an international audience, displaying proudly or not to the rest of the world the behaviors of Americans and how their system does or does not work so well. America should also be mentioned as perhaps an unintended audience, where they see their democracy at work through the lens of an outsider. All of these audiences add to why De Tocqueville wrote this great work and help support his claims made about American democracy.

Beginnings of De Tocqueville essay

De Tocqueville, American Democracy and the YMCA

In Democracy in America, Alexis De Tocqueville accurately paints a wonderful portrait of his impression of America Democracy for the better understanding of America for the rest of the world and the United States themselves. Many different can interpretations can be drawn from De Tocqueville‘s statements on democracy, but these statements can be uncovered even through the ambiguity of his account of America. De Tocqueville has a specific view and purpose for writing this work, where he claims that American democracy works because of a collaboration of citizens in political and voluntary associations, freedom for the individual even without complete equality and a limit of the downsides of majority rule, or as he puts it a tyranny of the majority. All claims made by De Tocqueville are shown through evidence throughout the book. De Tocqueville’s claims can be backed up by the understanding of a specific voluntary association, the YMCA. These claims of American democracy should also be viewed by his past and with the knowledge of the audience he was intending. The audience meant can be considered solely the French, but it can also be considered America as well.